|  | Big Rear Brakes 
 
 
 | 
Introduction
Why have big brakes on your MG? If you had a properly set up brake system, you 
could probably pull an F to a halt with discs the size of 50 pence pieces in 
practically the same distance as the same car with discs the size of dinner 
plates. Big brakes are heavy too – increasing unsprung weight. The way I look at 
this, unsprung weight describes that mass of metal at the end of the axle – the 
wheel, the tyre, the hub. The heavier this is, the harder the springs and 
dampers have to work to keep them under control after bouncing over bumps. Lower 
the unsprung weight, the easier it is to make a car handle and ride well. Big 
brakes are also expensive – not least because you’re looking at much more 
material being incorporated in them.
Big brakes can be a hazard.
Why on earth would anyone want big brakes? Putting aside marketing (go on, admit 
it, you love the look of huge brakes behind those shiny alloys of yours!), big 
brakes do have a purpose. It’s all about heat. While those 50pence-sized brakes 
could probably lead to wheel locking just as effectively as a big brake, they’d 
get so hot that they’d probably boil your brake fluid and probably ignite the 
friction material on the brake pads. Brakes convert kinetic energy into heat – 
and if you’re travelling fast, there may well be vast amounts of energy to 
disperse! Big brakes have an advantage: their much larger surface area means 
that they can shift much more heat in a much shorter period – which is ideal of 
a high performance sports car that is being used heavily on the track or on the 
road. But ultimately, they won’t stop your car any faster than an otherwise 
identical, smaller disc-equipped car. That said, the greater braking leverage 
that is to be gained from applying a retardation force at the edge of a larger 
disc means that for any given brake-pedal movement, you will get more stopping 
force applied. Unsurprising then that we all feel that big brakes mean more 
stopping power – but this is a subjective impression, and not the reality.
The funny thing is, the ultimate limiting factor of the rate of deceleration you get from brakes is not the braking system at all. It’s the tyres! No matter how heavy or light the car, the braking force is limited purely by how much grip your tyres can generate; the vehicle’s mass is simply not part of the equation.
| 
     | 
So why are we writing an article about big brakes in FTF? Well, MG started it. They started fitting 304mm AP Racing 4-pot calliper brakes to MGFs and then TFs. You have to agree that they do look sublime.
The odd thing was that they did absolutely nothing about the rear discs. MG didn’t even bother altering the settings of the brake bias valve.
Why should this matter? If the MGF and TF were a front 
engine car, then actually it probably wouldn’t matter at all. In a 1G stop (the 
same rate of change of velocity you’d feel if you’d jumped off a cliff edge), a 
front-engine car would load up its front wheels due to weight transfer 
effectively leading to 80 or indeed 90% of the work being performed by the front 
wheels. An MGF is rather different. It’s weight distribution is rather more rear 
biased (55% of the MG’s weight is over the rear wheels! [more]), 
meaning that under the same circumstances, the rear brakes are still playing an 
important role in slowing the progress of the car even during a 1G stop. 
Estimates suggest that the split is something more like 60:40 front/rear under 
these conditions. You can read more about this
here. 
Which is where my problem with the big front brake kits comes in. When ever I 
have driven cars fitted with the 304mm front disc, I have found that that is 
just too easy to lock the front wheels – it’s as though the rears simply aren’t 
pulling their weight in the stopping department. Given the mismatch in braking 
torques between a 304mm and a 240mm disc, this perhaps is not surprising. 
Frankly, a standard set up using race-bred pads all-round is far, far better 
from this balance perspective.
Balancing out bigger front brakes
One solution for the big brake imbalance is to fit more aggressive rear pads – say Mintex 1177 to Mintex 1144 at the front. But as anyone who is familiar with the 1177 pad will testify, they eat discs, and cover everything with tenacious pad dust… not ideal for a road car.
| 
     | 
The only other solution is to fit a larger rear disc. And given that 240mm discs look lost behind 16” wheels, there is an undeniable aesthetic justification for going down this route too.
It is probably no coincidence that this yawning chasm of a gap in the market has, until very recently, been left unfilled. Get your rear brakes wrong, and you run the very real risk of dangerous over-braking of the rear wheels and consquent rear lock up. Get rear-end lock up on entry to a corner, or even mid corner, and you’ll be saying a big hello to the scenery (and everything that Bill Oddy holds dear) as the rear of your MG goes hedge trimming. Dangerous. Brake design is probably best left to the professionals.
One of the ironies of the collapse of MG Rover is the release of engineering talent from the company into realms that hitherto it would never have travelled; into the hands of the enthusiast market. The chassis development team who worked with Rob Oldaker are a case in point. These guys have now set up their own company (Vehicle Handling Solutions) and are producing kits for MGF and TF owners. Find your TF too bouncy? They’ll do you replacement Bilstein dampers in the specification that they wanted them in the first place but weren’t allowed due to budget constraints. Want a better braking system for your MG, then you’d better ask…Which is what the MGF Register has done. And these guys have come up trumps. And as you can see from the picture to the left, the larger rear discs are worth fitting for the looks alone!
On the left is the standard-sized 240mm rear disc. On the right, the new 266mm rear discs. They don’t look quite so puny any more do they?
So you are interested in fitting these discs, how do you go about it?
| 
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 | 
Instructions: How to fit the VHS rear brake kit
| 1. | 
     | 
| 2. |   Now 
    raise the rear of the car up onto axle stands and remove the road wheels. With the road wheels removed, we can now gain access to the brakes themselves. | 
| 3. |  Disassemble 
    the brake carrier – there are two 8mm sliding bolts to undo – and once done 
    the outer pad carrier can be removed, along with the pad, as shown below. | 
| 4. |  Next 
    remove the calliper, swinging it up and away and secure on some wire (an old 
    coat hanger is ideal for this). | 
| 5. |  Next 
    identify remove the bolts retain the calliper to the hub carrier – in the 
    image to the right, we see that Wayne has already put a socket onto one of 
    the retaining bolts. 
 
     
 
     | 
| 6. |  Now remove the 
    discs – mine came off very easily as they had been replaced fairly recently 
    (oh well). The steps not shown here are removal of the two set-screws that 
    are fitted to help locate the disc to the hub, and the ‘gentle’ persuasion 
    required to release the disc from the hub – this may require some thumping 
    with a lump hammer, rotating the disc through 90 degrees between clouts to 
    release. Wayne made light work of these. I was 
    happy to take photographs… ;o) | 
| 7. |  Now clean up the 
    hubs with a wire brush to remove any loose rust or dirt from the hub 
    mounting surfaces. You’ll notice that the hub is nice and silver- that’s 
    because this was replaced very recently following a track day at Brands 
    Hatch; the bearing had completely failed – a known weak point in the MGF 
    chassis. | 
|   Here 
    are two close up pictures of the rear wheel hub. On the left, you'll notice 
    that the centre locator spigot has a rounded appearance as it meets the 
    mating face of the hub. On the right is the other design, which is squared 
    of, and has an additional ridge. Thus, as can be seen, there are in fact 
    more than one design of hub – but they all share one part number as far as I 
    can make out and appear to be fitted randomly to either side of the vehicle 
    (for instance my car had both designs, differing from one side to the other 
    – which makes things very confusing! This becomes important on this big brake conversion, as the central spigot is essential for locating the disc properly to the wheel hub as we’ll see… | |
| 8. |  But 
    first, yet more preparatory work with a wire brush! This time cleaning up 
    the hub carrier so that the calliper spacer/adapter plate can be fitted… | 
|  You may find 
    that you need a metal file to get a nice, flat mounting surface – the end 
    result should be as neat as this… | |
| 9. |  Now 
    we come to the first part of the kit to be fitted – the calliper spacer 
    bracket – a nice piece of anodised steel… | 
|  And some of the 
    rest of the kit – the silver rings are aluminium disc locators – recall what 
    I was saying about the disc locating on that central spigot – this is where 
    these come in… | |
|  And of course, 
    the big brakes themselves! They are re-drilled standard discs from the PSA 
    stable. The MGF PCD is established by slotting the existing mounting holes, 
    and two additional centring holes are also machined in the bell of the 
    discs. Nice work. When replacements are required, they’ll cost 80 quid plus 
    VAT… | |
|  Always 
    worth comparing new and old – the new discs are usefully larger than the 
    originals – just a shame they’re not slotted like the Rover Sport items I 
    was taking off… | |
| 10. |  This is the 
    clever bit. Whereas the standard disc locates to the outer edge of the 
    standard hub, the replacement discs centre on these adapter rings over the 
    centre bore spigot. Here’s Wayne offering up on of the adapter rings to this 
    hub. As mentioned earlier, there is more than one design of wheel hub – but 
    fortunately, the chaps at VHS are able to supply adapter rings to suit what 
    ever hubs you happen to have on your car – be they square shouldered, as 
    here or… | 
|  …the 
    round-shouldered hub as pictured here (this happens to be the hub on the 
    opposite side of the car on my MGF - as mentioned above in point 7). | |
|  The 
    ring adapter simply slides neatly into place. With the disc bolted in place, 
    it is sandwiched in place, so isn’t going to go anywhere! | |
| 11. |  Now we move 
    to the next stage: a nice cup of tea, and bolting the calliper carrier to 
    the spacer using the supplied counter-sunk screws… | 
|  One in, one more 
    to go… | |
|  … 
    and now the calliper can be mounted into its new position somewhat further 
    displaced from the centre of the hub than before. | |
| 12. |  Replacement 
    calliper carrier bolts are supplied with the kit – and here we can see the 
    assembly being bolted into position. | 
|  Job done: 
    calliper carrier now securely bolted into place. | |
| 13. |  Now we can 
    slide the new larger disc into place. | 
|   The 
    retaining screws are now fitted to bring the disc into the correct position. 
 | |
|  Disc rotated 
    through 360 degrees several times to ensure that there is no significant 
    ‘wobble’ or ‘run-out’… You can use a dial position indicator (DPI, arrow 7 
    below) to ensure millimetric location precision. 
     | |
| 14. |  Satisfied that 
    the disc is true when rotated, the calliper can be reassembled… First with 
    nice, new Mintex 1144 pads. | 
| 15. |  Before the 
    remainder of the calliper can be fitted, the piston needs to be screwed back 
    into its housing. Before doing this, remove the cap on the brake master 
    cylinder to ensure that there isn’t too much fluid already in the reservoir 
    – if there is, it may spill out over the paintwork and burn it off! Brake 
    fluid is a very effective paint striper… | 
|  Once the 
    piston is screwed in (it moves clockwise – you can use any straight edge to 
    screw the piston into the calliper housing, or you can use a pair of pliers, 
    or you can even buy the Rover tool designed specially for the job!) Here Wayne finishes off the job – calliper now back in place. Perhaps we should have given the calliper a lick of paint before refitting? You could certainly do this when working on your own car. | |
| 16. |  Close up of the 
    completed disc and adapter assembly – it could almost be standard equipment 
    couldn’t it? | 
|  And now 
    with the road wheel fitted, looking absolutely stunning. | 
 Big 
rear brakes fitted – worth doing?
Big 
rear brakes fitted – worth doing?
The answer to this is definitely yes. Some would argue that 
they’re worth fitting for the aesthetic value alone – those discs no longer look 
lost behind 16” alloys in the way that the original 240mm items did. But that 
wasn’t the reason for fitting them. The real proof of the pudding is on the road 
and track – and I have to say that the brake balance with these discs is simply 
brilliant. You can really heave on the middle peddle without fear of inducing 
premature lock up of the front wheels – the rears also mean that the total 
retardation is ultimately great than if you were braking using the front wheels 
alone. And I am hopeful of additional benefits too – compared to my old brake 
set up, I am hopeful that these discs will run a good deal cooler, which ought 
to be good news in terms of brake disc and brake pad longevity, not to mention 
the life span of the rear bearings themselves.
If you find yourself close to needing new rear discs and pads on your MGF/TF, I 
would certainly recommend fitting these rear brakes. In the words of Tony the 
Tiger: “They’re Grrrrrreat!”