Exploring Urban Brake Myth
#1: Bigger brakes make my car stop faster
|
The most surprising things about deceleration under braking is that it hardly matters how much force the brakes are able to apply, the maximum rate of retardation (deceleration) is dictated pure and simple by coefficient of friction between the tyre and the road surface (see Background 2). Standard brakes are capable of inducing front tyre lock under extremis - and thus are capable of generating sufficient force for much of the braking cycle. If this is the case, fitting larger brakes that generate more force than standard will be wasted, as the amax will be constant - and the adhesion limit simply exceeded earlier. All that extra effort will be wasted in tyre smoke from locked wheels.
So why bother with bigger brakes?
The big brake mistake
The least stable situation to ever encounter on the road is where the rear brakes lock up before the front brakes - this is circumstance that will, more than likely, end up with the car making an exit from the asphalt to the hedgerow rear end first. It is much more stable if the front wheels lock first; the car will simply under-steer, and offers the driver maximum opportunity to release the brakes to regain control of the car (whether the driver takes this opportunity is entirely up to the driver's skill and ability!). Thus, most after-market suppliers will provide you with a large front disc conversion only - typically because of the relative safety provided by front-wheel lock up, and the fact that the handbrake mechanism that usually works on the rear wheels can be a real challenge to engineer correctly.
So what is with the provocative title?
We know that the maximum deceleration of any tyre is a constant - and is dictated by the coefficient of friction between the tyre and the road surface. Let's say that the maximum rate of retardation our tyres can generate is 0.9G.
From our worked example of weight transfer, we know that at 0.9G on our 'virtual' MGF, that 60% of the weight of the car is now being transferred to the ground through the front wheels. That means for maximum deceleration, the front brakes need to develop a force of 660 x 0.9G, whereas the rear brakes need to generate 440 x 0.9G.
If the front brakes develop more force at the tyre/road interface than 660 x 0.9G for a given pedal movement, then the front wheels will lock as the tyre starts to slide. Worse, the rear brakes will not yet be developing its maximum decelerative force of 440 x 0.9G - meaning that the total retardive force is less than 1100 x 0.9G. Thus the car is not going to decelerate as quickly as a perfectly balance braking system.
This is the big brake mistake: installing large front brakes and paying no attention to the balance can result in worse brake performance and longer stopping distances.
Can a brake bias valve help? Not really - as these only reduce braking efficiency to over come an inherent deficiency. They are always found fitted to the rear brakes (in the standard example, the bias is set at around 60:40 front to rear). If you fit larger front brakes, and reduce the bias then some semblance of balance can be achieved (and presumably, this is what has been achieved on the MGF Trophy and TF160). However, it would be better to have brakes that maintain the same ratio of braking forces - which on the standard MGF with 240mm discs front and rear must be 1:1 in terms of leverage.
There are other ways in which the forces can be distributed - such as the area of the calliper's pistons. The larger the piston area, the larger amount of hydraulic fluid that is required to move that piston a given distance. So if the brake calipers you choose use much larger pistons that the originals, you'll need to shift a good deal more fluid to bring the pads into contact with the brake rotors - often necessitating a larger master cylinder. But changing the ratio of the front to rear caliper areas can influence how much force is applied to a given disc for a given amount of pedal movement. On the standard MGF for example, front piston area is 2x p272 whilst the rear is 2x pX2 - so there are differences in hydraulic advantage that can be used - and again needs to be borne in mind when installing non-standard braking components. If you plan to keep the standard brake bias valve, then clearly the original ratio needs to be maintained. In short - there's a lot more to upgrading brakes than just slapping on the biggest and cheapest discs you can lay your mits on!
The big brake mistake: don't expect ABS to cover up brake design problems
Talk of different piston areas and therefore hydraulic volumes brings around the subject of how big brakes can impact upon the operation of the ABS. The following extract comes from the StopTech.com website, written by James Walker:
Extract
from http://www.stoptech.com/whitepapers/ ABS Control In Super-Slow-Mo In order to best explain how the ABS "depends" on the base braking system, let's have a look at a typical ABS event at the micro level - from the processing algorithm's perspective. Say you are driving down the motorway at 70 mph (at the speed limit, of course) when all of a sudden the lorry in front of you spills its load of natural spring water across all three lanes of traffic. Now, this alone would not be so bad, except the water is still sealed in 100 litre drums - one of which would certainly make a mess of your car's front bumper. Time to take evasive action. Being the trained high-speed individual that you are, you immediately lift off the throttle, release the clutch, and simultaneously nail the brake pedal...but in the heat of the moment you hit it a little too hard. Meanwhile, the ABS is hanging back watching the world go by, seeing a constant stream of 70 mph signals from its four wheel speed sensors. Let's call this "observation mode." Upon your application of the brake, however, the ABS snaps to attention, its antenna up, ready for action. You have just hit the brake pedal after all, and who know what's coming next. After 50 milliseconds (it's actually much faster than that - 7 to 10 milliseconds is typical - but it makes the math easier) the ABS takes another snapshot of the wheel speed information in an attempt to figure out what's going on. This time the wheel speed sensors are all reporting a speed of 69 mph. Doing a quick calculation, the ABS determines that in order to have slowed 1 MPH in a 50ms period the wheels must be decelerating at a rate of 0.91g's. Because you are driving a sports car, the engineer who calibrated the system 'taught' the ABS that your car is capable of decelerating at this rate, so the ABS continues to hang back and watch the event from the spectator's booth. No problem so far. The next 50ms, however, are a little more interesting. This time around, the wheels are reporting 66.5 mph. Now, it may not seem like a big jump, but to slow 1.5 MPH in a 50ms window equates to a deceleration of 1.36g's. Not alarming, but the ABS 'knows' that based on this deceleration level, the wheels are probably beginning to slip a little more than they should - after all, your car is probably not decelerating at quite 1.36g's..and any error between the two indicates slip. ABS is now in "ready mode." It's probably too soon to jump in, as the wheels might spin back up on their own in the next 50ms loop, but things are definitely looking bad! As the first barrels of spring water bounce left and right, missing your car by inches, you stay on the brake pedal but push even harder. This time around, the left front wheel speed sensor is registering 62 mph - a 4.5 mph drop in the last 50ms, or a deceleration level of 4.1g's. Doing the math faster than you can (after all, you are busy dodging barrels of spring water), the ABS quickly comes to the conclusion that, unlike the left front wheel at this moment, the car cannot possibly be decelerating at 4.1g's. Best case is that the car was decelerating at 1.0g (or thereabouts) over the last 50ms, so the 'real' vehicle speed is still somewhere around 67.5 mph, even though the left front wheel speed is reading 64 mph - a 3.5 mph error. So, based on a wheel deceleration of 4.1g's, a slip level of 5% (3.5 mph 66.5 mph), and a couple other factors not listed here, the ABS jumps in and enters "isolation mode." (Note that the wheels are nowhere even near "wheel lock" - the 100% slip point.) The first thing the ABS does is shut off the hydraulic line from the master cylinder to the left front caliper, isolating the driver from applying more pressure - after all, it was the driver that got us into this mess in the first place. Next, the ABS starts work in "decrease mode," releasing the excess pressure from the left front caliper in order to allow the left front wheel to reaccelerate back up to the vehicle's actual speed - 66.5 mph in this case. Since the ABS knows how quickly the wheel is decelerating (4.1g), how fast the car is actually going (66.5 mph), and the pressure-torque characteristics of the left front caliper/pad/rotor assembly (we'll come back to this one in just a second), it can precisely calculate how long to open its release valve to vent that extra pressure, leaving just enough pressure in the caliper to maintain 1.0g of deceleration (or thereabouts). Let's say that calculated time turned out to be 10 milliseconds (this again makes the math easier later on). Bang! Valve opens, pressure is released, and 10ms later it closes, leaving just the right amount of pressure in the caliper so that the wheel spins back up to exactly 66.5 mph, but continues to decelerate at 1.0g. Everything is going as planned. Time to close the loop and enter "increase mode." Once the ABS sees that the left front wheel has returned to near the 'real' vehicle speed, it slowly reapplies pressure from the master cylinder to make sure that maximum sustainable brake force is being utilized. To this end, the ABS calculates precisely how long to pulse open the isolation valve, slowly building pressure at the left front caliper until once again the left front wheel begins to slip. It performs this calculation based on - you guessed it - how quickly the wheel is re-accelerating, how fast the car is actually going, and the pressure-torque characteristics of the caliper/pad/rotor assembly. In our hypothetical little world, the ABS calculated that four pulses of 5ms each were necessary to build the wheel pressure back up to the point that the wheel began to slip again, returning to "isolation mode." The cycle is repeated on all four wheels simultaneously until either the driver gets out of the brake pedal, or until the car has come to a stop. Hopefully, this did not include punting a spring water barrel or two along the way as the ABS kept all four wheels slips in the 5%-10% range, allowing you to turn and swerve to your heart's content as the drums bounced out of your path. Happy car, happy driver. The Potential Impacts Of "Big Brakes" Let's now take the exact same scenario, but add a twist: you are returning home from having that long-sought-after big brake kit installed. You know, the one that required new 18" wheels to clear the 8-piston calipers and 16" rotors. Driving around the parking lot you couldn't believe the improvement in pedal feel and initial bite they displayed. These things must really throw a boat anchor behind the car at high speeds, right? Well, let's see... Resisting the temptation to run in the fast lane at triple-digit speeds, you once again find yourself behind the spring water truck at 70 mph. Barrels fly and you again lay on the brakes, but with the increased confidence of your new hardware to slow you down in time. Plus, you now know how the ABS works, so you lay into the pedal, confident that you will have both deceleration and steerability. It couldn't get any better. Like scenario 1, after the initial 50, 100, and 150 milliseconds the ABS takes snapshots of the wheel speed information and registers 0.91g's, 1.36g's, and 4.1g's on the left front wheel. Again the ABS quickly comes to the conclusion that, unlike the left front wheel at this moment, the car cannot possibly be decelerating at 4.1g's. Best case is that the car was decelerating at 1.0g (or thereabouts) over the last 50ms, so the 'real' vehicle speed is still somewhere around 66.5 mph, even though the left front wheel speed is reading 63 mph - a 3.5 MPH error. So far, so good - just like last time. Here's where things start to get interesting, though. ABS enters "isolation mode" and shuts off the hydraulic line from the master cylinder to the left front caliper, isolating the driver from applying more pressure. Next, the ABS starts work in "decrease mode," and once again calculates that 10ms are required to the excess pressure from the left front caliper in order to allow the left front wheel to reaccelerate back up to the vehicle's actual speed - 66.5 mph in this case. Unfortunately, this calculation was based on the standard vehicle's pressure-torque characteristics of the left front caliper/pad/rotor assembly. Let's talk about this briefly while the barrels roll in closer. Pressure-Torque And Pressure-Volume Relationships When a braking system is designed and installed, the components are chosen to provide a certain deceleration level for a certain amount of force applied by the driver to the brake pedal. While the overall relationship is critical, there are many ways to achieve the same end but fundamentally the parts are chosen to work together as a system. One of the most important relationships for the ABS engineer is the pressure-torque (P-T) relationship of the caliper/pad/rotor assembly. In so many words, for a given brake fluid pressure, X, the caliper/pad/rotor assembly will build up a certain amount of torque, Y. For the sake of argument, let's assume that adding 100 PSI of brake pressure to the stock caliper in our example vehicle generates 100 ft-lb. of torque. Another important relationship is the pressure-volume (P-V) characteristic of the system. This relationship defines the swelling or expansion of the brake system for a given increase in pressure. Let's also say that our stock vehicle brake system 'swells' 1cc for every 100 PSI. Unfortunately, there are several big-brake systems available today which pay no regard to the original P-T or P-V relationships of the original vehicle and in fact many make it a point to affect drastic changes in these relationships in order to give the consumer that feeling of 'increased bite.' While the upside is certainly a firmer pedal and higher partial-braking deceleration for the same pedal force, the trade-off can be ABS confusion. Back To The Barrels So, back to our example - the ABS has just calculated that a 10ms pressure reduction pulse was necessary to vent that extra pressure, leaving just enough pressure in the caliper to maintain 1.0g of deceleration (or thereabouts) but the new system with its decreased P-V characteristics (increased stiffness!) releases twice as much pressure as the stock system in the same 10ms window (the equivalent of a 20ms pulse with the stock system)! Of course, the increased P-T characteristics (bigger rotor! bigger pistons!) don't help either, as now three to four times as much torque has been removed from the wheel as with the stock system, leaving only enough torque to decelerate the wheel at, say, 0.3g. In ABS land this is known as a 'decel hole' and feels just like you momentarily took your foot off the brake pedal. Now, given that huge pressure decrease, the ABS quickly enters "increase mode," trying to correct and build the pressure back up near the vehicle's maximum sustainable brake force. This takes time and time equals lost stopping distance. The ABS calculates precisely how long to pulse open the isolation valve and determines that four pulses of 5ms each are necessary, just like before. Because of the new P-T and P-V characteristics however, after only two pulses the wheel is again being forced into slip, leaving the ABS scratching its head and wondering what's going on. Not expecting wheel slip so soon, the ABS quickly releases pressure in an attempt to recover, but the damage has already been done. The cycle is repeated on all four wheels simultaneously until either the driver gets out of the brake pedal, or until the car has come to a stop but this time the ABS is always one step behind. In some cases the ABS is robust to modest changes in the base brake system, but in extreme cases there can be a significant negative impact to the vehicle's steerability (increased front wheel slip due to poor control) and a measurable increase in stopping distance (multiple 'make up' decrease pulses).
Are You Telling Me That Big Brakes Are A Bad Idea? So, will all big brake upgrades wreak havoc on the chassis control systems found on your favorite ride? Not necessarily. In fact, if designed and chosen properly, these upgrades can make the most of these control technologies while providing all of the cooling and thermal robustness advantages these kits have to offer. The "secret" to brake system compatibility is that there is no secret - it just requires fundamental engineering expertise and design know-how. As mentioned earlier, far too many of the big brake upgrade kits on the market today pay no attention to the P-T or P-V characteristics that the car originally possessed. In fact, there are kits available today which have P-T characteristics which more than double the output (P==>2T) of the stock systems they replace - "200% More Stopping Power" must be better than stock, right? In most cases, these vendors procure large quantities of big rotors and red calipers, fabricate an adapter bracket to mount them to a variety of different suspensions, and market the kit as a 'one-size-fits-all' without first determining if the system will be compatible with the remaining foundation braking system, let alone the electronic chassis controls. Sure, it's quick, cost-effective, and looks like a million bucks through your 18" wheels, but what about ultimate performance? |
In essence what the guys at StopTech are telling us is that the ABS will not be able to bale out a poorly considered large brake upgrade - in fact, ABS CAN make the situation worse if the pressure/torque and pressure/volume relationships are outside the design parameters of the standard fit system. This probably goes to explain why when the first MGF Trophy 160s were launched, they were done so without the benefit of ABS as standard fit: there simply hadn't been time to re-calibrate the ABS software. Interestingly though, it appears that those who have fitted larger brake kits on older MGFs (be that the MG AP racing disc/caliper set or HiSpec's 4-pot calipers), none have reported significant problems with the ABS. Unfortunately, I am not quite sure how much of an endorsement this is.